OpenAI o1-preview
Rank #10
Power: 6165.77
View all Lmarena text generation LLM rankings

💡 What is Model Power?

Model Power = how strong and reliable a model is, based on real people's votes. It combines performance scores with user confidence to give you the most accurate assessment of each model's capabilities.

Looking for the right LLM for your needs?

Discover which model is the best and most suitable for your specific use cases. Our comprehensive analysis of OpenAI o1-preview text generation LLMs reveals the true performance landscape, powered by millions of real user votes and LMarena Pro ranking system. Whether you're building AI applications, content creation, or research projects, find your perfect match from the world's most advanced language models.

👉 Find My Best-Fit LLM
Compare with o1-preview best text generation LLMs

📊 Comparison with Top 10 Models

This section compares Rank 10 (o1-preview) with the top 10 best performing models. The coefficient shows the performance difference: Positive coefficient = Better than Rank 10, Negative coefficient = Worse than Rank 10. Coefficient = (Model Power - Rank 10 Power) / Rank 10 Power × 100

o3-2025-04-16 OpenAI
According to user voting, the o3-2025-04-16 model is 7.70% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #1
+7.70%
gemini-2.5-pro Google
According to user voting, the gemini-2.5-pro model is 6.91% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #2
+6.91%
chatgpt-4o-latest-20250326 OpenAI
According to user voting, the chatgpt-4o-latest-20250326 model is 6.29% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #3
+6.29%
gemini-2.5-flash Google
According to user voting, the gemini-2.5-flash model is 3.70% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #4
+3.70%
grok-3-preview-02-24 xAI
According to user voting, the grok-3-preview-02-24 model is 3.44% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #5
+3.44%
claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219-thinking-32k Anthropic
According to user voting, the claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219-thinking-32k model is 1.69% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #6
+1.69%
claude-opus-4-20250514 Anthropic
According to user voting, the claude-opus-4-20250514 model is 1.62% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #7
+1.62%
gpt-4.1-2025-04-14 OpenAI
According to user voting, the gpt-4.1-2025-04-14 model is 1.04% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #8
+1.04%
deepseek-v3-0324 DeepSeek
According to user voting, the deepseek-v3-0324 model is 0.55% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #9
+0.55%
RANK 10
o1-preview OpenAI
This is the reference model (Rank #10) - all comparisons are relative to this model
Rank #10
0.00%
Compare with o1-preview similar text generation LLMs

📊 Comparison with Similar Performance Models

This section compares Rank 10 with the 5 best models above it (Ranks 5-9) and 5 worst models below it (Ranks 11-15). The coefficient shows the performance difference relative to Rank 10.

grok-3-preview-02-24 xAI
According to user voting, the grok-3-preview-02-24 model is 3.44% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #5
+3.44%
claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219-thinking-32k Anthropic
According to user voting, the claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219-thinking-32k model is 1.69% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #6
+1.69%
claude-opus-4-20250514 Anthropic
According to user voting, the claude-opus-4-20250514 model is 1.62% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #7
+1.62%
gpt-4.1-2025-04-14 OpenAI
According to user voting, the gpt-4.1-2025-04-14 model is 1.04% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #8
+1.04%
deepseek-v3-0324 DeepSeek
According to user voting, the deepseek-v3-0324 model is 0.55% percentage better for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #9
+0.55%
RANK 10
o1-preview OpenAI
This is the reference model (Rank #10) - all comparisons are relative to this model
Rank #10
0.00%
claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 Anthropic
According to user voting, the claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 model is 1.05% percentage worse for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #11
-1.05%
gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18 OpenAI
According to user voting, the gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18 model is 1.87% percentage worse for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #12
-1.87%
claude-3-5-haiku-20241022 Anthropic
According to user voting, the claude-3-5-haiku-20241022 model is 2.68% percentage worse for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #13
-2.68%
gpt-4o-2024-05-13 OpenAI
According to user voting, the gpt-4o-2024-05-13 model is 3.49% percentage worse for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #14
-3.49%
claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 Anthropic
According to user voting, the claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 model is 4.30% percentage worse for text generation compared to o1-preview.
Rank #15
-4.30%